What is a Value?
Our values, at the most basic level, are the things that are important to us, things we "assign value" to. Because you might assign value to something I do not perceive as important, our values are as unique and individual as we are. That said, social scientists believe that all values have some things in common. In addition, some, like Schwartz, believe that there are some overarching values under which others values "fit," and that there are certain values that are recognized cross-culturally.
Our values are inextricably linked to our goals and motivations. When we truly understand what drives us we can better determine how to create an aligned life in which dissonance between our core beliefs and the actions we both participate in and those we tolerate (remember, what we allow, we teach) is minimized - and ideally eliminated.
​
Schwartz Theory of Basic Values
According to Schwartz, values have six main features:
-
Values are beliefs which, when activated, become infused with feeling. We have an inherent emotional reaction when our values are challenged, threatened, or reinforced.
-
Values refer to desirable goals which motivate action - if social justice is a core value, you will work towards its existence.
-
Values transcend specific actions and situations - if honesty is a core value, it is relevant at home and at work, with family and with strangers.
-
Values serve as standards or criteria - we determine what we believe to be good or bad, justified or not, worth doing or avoiding based on how it fits with and will effect our core values.
-
Values are ordered by importance - we may value tradition and equality, but when forced to prioritize, we value one over the other.
-
It is the relative importance we assign to our Values that guides our actions.
What distinguishes one value from another is the type of goal or motivation is expresses. For Schwartz, the ten broad values he has identified are defined their underlying motivations. Below is a brief overview of these, and I encourage you to dive deeper!
-
Self-Direction - expresses the need for independent thought and action, the ability to choose, create & explore
-
Stimulation - expresses the need for excitement, novelty & challenge
-
Hedonism - expresses the need for pleasure or sensuous gratification
-
Achievement - expresses the need for personal success through demonstrating socially-approved competence
-
Power - expresses the need for control, dominance, social status & prestige
-
Security - expresses the need for safety, harmony & stability of society, relationships & self
-
Conformity - expresses the need for restraining actions likely to harm others or violate social norms
-
Tradition - expresses the need for commitment and acceptance of the customs & ideas of one's culture or religion
-
Benevolence - expresses the need for preserving & enhancing the welfare of one's in-group
-
Universalism - expresses the need for understanding, appreciating & protecting the welfare of all people & nature
​
One of my favorite aspects of this theory is how Schwartz arranges the value in essentially a circular continuum (imagine a pie cut into 10 slices with each value above in one [conformity & tradition split one] in the order above). He does this because of the related motivational emphases of adjacent values. For example, power & achievement both express a need for social superiority and esteem, while achievement & hedonism express a need for self-centered satisfaction. Benevolence & tradition express a devotion to one's in-group, while benevolence & conformity expresses a need for normative behavior that promotes close relationships. The closer two values are on the circle, the more similar their underlying motivations, the more distant, the more antagonistic.
Consider for a moment, what the emotional, physical, and mental impact would be if your organization's top two values were power and achievement, while yours are self-direction and universalism. Or the strain you might experience in a romantic relationship if you place high value on security, while your partner places high value on stimulation. Identifying and understanding your core values is key to creating your best and most aligned life.
​
My Experience
I completed the Schwartz assessment during my Gonzaga Master's program, and it identified Universalism as my primary value, followed by Self-Direction, Benevolence & Security. In analyzing my own results, I was struck by the fact that while my top three values were all close neighbors on the continuum, my forth was nearly directly opposite in terms of motivation. What I came to realize was that due to a childhood and early adulthood in which financial and emotional security were lacking, I had developed an inner narrative that stability and harmony were the necessary for happiness. Because this motivation was essentially antagonistic to my primary three values, I made some choices that increased my levels of stress and frustration - and did some internal and external damage along the way. By placing a stronger focus on my need to create and explore as well as protect and preserve the well-being of both those I love and the universe as a whole, I am working to live a more aligned and congruent life.
​
Personal Values Assessment
This is a free online assessment I found when looking for additional resources. Unlike the Schwartz Theory, this test doesn't try to narrow the idea of values into cross-cultural over-arching terms. Instead, it gives you 59 different possible values and asks you to choose any that call out to you, and then has you do a series of prioritization clicks to help you identify your top five. As with the Schwartz Theory, this research-based site concludes that values are a strong motivation for us to act, and that we are happiest when we live as much in harmony with our values as possible, experiencing a sense of inner consistency and satisfaction.
The introduction to the test refers to values as signposts telling us which way to go to get where we want, and points out that our independent decisions will always be, to some degree, geared towards the realization of our values. It also poses the question - did you choose your values yourself? The answer it suggests is more complex than you might think, explaining that your values were determined by the whole baggage of experience you have gathered along the way. All the events and situations that helped you discover what’s important to you. It also reminds us that we may experience single moments that can completely remodel our hierarchy of values. For example, how might your values change if you received a terminal diagnosis? Or someone you loved did? Would they change if you experienced childbirth or your company declared bankruptcy without warning? In addition, it reminds us that values are a very individual matter. Even if two people declare that their most important value is success, each of them may ascribe a different meaning to it and implement this value in their own way.
​
My Experience
I took this test about 15 months after I took the Schwartz assessment. My top five identified values through this assessment are Love, Family, Compassion, Helpfulness, and Authenticity. Because of the format of the assessment, while values like Security, Independence, and Creativity were all possibilities (and ones I initially chose), when the time came to prioritize them against the ones that became my top five, I did not hesitate. For me, these values feel like coming home after a journey, and as I crafted the value-aligned interview questions for my own use, I was excited to see if they truly could help me find my own next step.
​